Friday, May 6, 2011

New arrangement in LIC management


The government today appointed Rakesh Singh, additional secretary in the department of financial services, as the acting chairman of the Life Insurance Corporation, while demoting incumbent T.S. Vijayan to the post of managing director.

The move follows the cash-for-loans scam, which engulfed LIC’s housing finance arm in November. This is for the first time that any LIC chairman has been asked to work as the managing director.

Vijayan has been LIC’s chairman since 2006. He was eligible for an extension till his superannuation age of 60 in 2013, but the government decided to appoint a bureaucrat as an interim head.

His demotion comes within weeks of the finance ministry setting up a committee under former RBI deputy governor Vepa Kamesam to probe the investments made by the LIC in the last three years.

The committee is expected to make recommendations on the governance standards and investment guidelines of the country’s largest financial institution. The LIC manages assets of about Rs 12 lakh crore.

The CBI had arrested LIC Housing CEO R.R. Nair and several others for allegedly sanctioning loans after taking bribes.

Singh, a 1978 IAS batch officer, will be in charge for three months or till the time a full-time chairman is appointed, sources said.


Priority to repo rate


The Reserve Bank of India has decided to make the repo rate the centerpiece of its monetary policy even as it raised the key benchmark rate by a higher-than-expected 50 basis points to 7.25 per cent as part of an aggressive inflation-busting strategy.

Governor Duvvuri Subbarao seemed to abandon the earlier nuanced position of carefully balancing the compulsions of quelling raging inflation through rate increases with the imperatives of accelerating the pace of growth in the world’s second-fastest economy.

The task of bringing down inflation should take precedence “even at the cost of some growth in the short term”, the RBI said in its latest monetary policy statement.

“The objective is to bring down inflation to somewhere between 4 per cent and 4.5 per cent. In the medium term, we would like to take it down to 3 per cent,” he said.

The RBI governor forecast a GDP growth of 8 per cent for this fiscal with inflation projected at 6 per cent with an upside bias.

The 8 per cent GDP forecast casts doubts on the government’s projections of 9 per cent this year. Moreover, the 8 per cent growth forecast assumes a normal monsoon and global crude oil prices at $110 a barrel.

The sharp 50-basis-point increase in the repo rate seemed to catch bankers and the markets off guard. “If you are referring to 25 basis points as a baby step, then yes, this is no longer a baby step,” Subbarao said in response to a question raised at a press conference later in the day.

The mandarins of Mint Road showed unexpected alacrity in overhauling the monetary policy template by picking up several elements from the report of a working group headed by RBI executive director Deepak Mohanty that was submitted less than 50 days ago.
Governor Subbarao accepted the Mohanty panel’s suggestion that the repo should be the only rate-signalling device of the monetary policy.

“The transition to a single independently varying policy rate is expected to more accurately signal the monetary policy stance,” the RBI said.

It also decided to fix the reverse repo rate at 100 basis points below the repo at 6.25 per cent. This makes the repo the only variable rate in the monetary policy. The reverse repo will move in tandem with it and will always rule 100 basis points below it.

The spread between the repo and reverse repo narrowed to 100 basis points on September 16 last year from 125 basis points earlier.

The Mohanty panel — which was set up in September to suggest ways to overhaul the process of monetary policy formulation — had recommended that the moribund bank rate should be reactivated as a discount rate and could form the “upper bound in the rate corridor”.

The bank rate has been stuck at 6 per cent since March 2004.

The Mohanty committee had suggested a rate corridor of 150 basis points with the bank rate ruling 50 basis points higher than the repo.

The RBI widened the corridor to 200 basis points by creating a new marginal standing facility (MSF). This will give banks a new window from which they can borrow overnight funds up to 1 per cent of their net demand and time liabilities. The Mohanty panel had suggested something very similar and had called it an exceptional standing facility.

The MSF rate has been fixed at 100 basis points above the repo rate at 8.25 per cent.
Subbarao said there were some problems with refashioning the bank rate as a discount rate.

“There are legal problems and some other interest rates are linked to the bank rate. One option is to resolve the legal issues and delink the interest rates,” he added. “The bank rate will stay for now and later we will link it to something else.”

The central bank also said the weighted average overnight call money rate would be the operating target of the monetary policy. This rate currently hovers at 6.44 per cent.

Tighter provisioning

The biggest beef for bankers was over the sudden decision to tighten provisioning norms for certain categories of advances. Last December, the banks were advised to achieve a provisioning coverage ratio of 70 per cent — which had upset banks such as the SBI.

The RBI has now said that advances classified as sub-standard assets will attract a provision of 15 per cent against 10 per cent earlier. The unsecured exposure of a sub-standard asset will attract an additional provision of 10 per cent. This means the total exposure on these assets will rise to 25 per cent from 20 per cent earlier.

Advances in the doubtful category up to one year will attract a provision of 25 per cent (20 per cent earlier).

The secured portion of advances which have been in the doubtful category for more than one year and up to three years will attract a provision of 40 per cent against 30 per cent earlier.

Restructured accounts classified as standard advances will attract a provision of 2 per cent in the first two years from the date of the restructuring.

The first-quarter monetary policy review is scheduled on July 26. 

Mutual Funds brace for outflow


Mutual funds may have to take a hit of around Rs 35,000-40,000 crore over the next six months.

The Reserve Bank has restricted banks from investing more than 10 per cent of their net worth as at the end of the previous financial year in the liquid/money market funds of mutual funds.

Banks that have investments over and above this cap are allowed to bring them down to the prescribed limit in the next six months.

At the end of March 2011, liquid/money market schemes of mutual funds had Rs 73,666 crore of assets under management.

Clearly, banks are going to pull their investments out of liquid funds over the next six months which could lead to an outflow of Rs 35,000-40,000 crore from liquid funds.

In my opinion banks have investments in almost all mutual funds and, therefore, most funds will suffer from this directive of the RBI. However, since banks comprise only a part of the institutional business of asset management companies, the effect of the outflow will be only partial and we would like to compensate this by getting in more corporate clients, NBFCs and insurance companies.

In the monetary policy announcement, the RBI governor said this measure was taken “to prevent systematic risk in times of liquidity crunch”.

Such a crisis had emerged in September-October 2008 after the sub-prime crisis came to light and Lehman Brothers fell in the US. There was a massive redemption pressure on mutual funds, and they had to stop payment to investors because of liquidity constraints. Banks were directed to extend additional liquidity support to mutual funds to help them handle the crisis.

Subsequently, market regulator Sebi revised the valuation norms for debt securities held by mutual funds, and from July 1, 2010 it had been mandatory for funds to mark to market (traded value) debt and money market securities with residual maturity of 91 days.

Following this, the debt schemes, particularly the short-term ones, became volatile in terms of NAV. This change in valuation norms also witnessed a large outflow of investment by institutional investors from liquid and ultra-liquid schemes. AUM of liquid funds, which stood at Rs 73,666 crore as at the end of March 2011, was Rs 78,094 crore at the end of March last year and Rs 90,594 at the end of March 2009.