The Food and Drug Administration approved a drug yesterday
that could dramatically reduce the risk of contracting HIV, the virus that
causes AIDS, among high-risk groups.
Truvada, a little blue pill taken once a day, was shown in
clinical studies to slash transmission of the virus by up to 75 per cent. “This
is a big step,” said Marjorie Hill, chief executive of the AIDS group GayMen’s
HealthCrisis. “If people are looking for the magic bullet, the cure-all, we
don’t have it yet. What we do have is an increasingly growing tool kit.”
Many HIV and AIDS researchers and activists say the pill is a
promising way to reduce new infections, which have remained stubbornly high for
years.
“It’s going to save lives,” Hill said.
But others worry it will have the opposite effect by
encouraging unprotected sex. “Today marks a catastrophe in the fight against
HIV in America,” Michael Weinstein, president of the AIDS Healthcare Foundation
in Los Angeles, told reporters in a conference call. “If you look back five
years from today, you will see this decision by the FDA will cause there to be
more infections, not less.”
Truvada, made by the Foster City, California, pharmaceutical
firm Gilead Sciences, was first approved in 2004 to help treat people infected
with HIV. In those who are not infected, it can prevent the virus from getting
a foothold in the body.
In a clinical study of heterosexual couples in Africa in
which one partner was infected with HIV, taking the pill reduced transmission
rates by 75 per cent. In a separate study of gay men, the drug reduced
transmission by 42 per cent. The pill is most effective when taken every day —
something even study participants struggled with — and when combined with
condom use.
The FDA will require that patients have an HIV test before
getting a prescription to ensure they are not already infected. If they are,
the virus could develop resistance to Truvada, which is combined with another
drug to treat those already infected.
The annual rate of new HIV infections in the US has remained
about 50,000 since at least 2004, and rates have risen among young, gay black
men. The Obama administration pledged to cut the number of new infections 25
per cent by 2015, but existing methods of prevention — essentially condoms and
abstinence — have not budged the number.
The FDA has been searching for alternatives. Debra Birnkrant,
director of the agency’s Division of Anti-viral Products, said yesterday’s
approval would spur progress toward the administration’s goal. “The hope is
over time it will reduce the rate of new infections or incidence in the US,”
she said.
Treating HIV has been shown to reduce a patient’s likelihood
of transmitting the disease. But offering new ways for HIV-negative people to
protect themselves is important because a disproportionate number of infections
are caused by people who have not been tested and are unaware they are
infected.
“If you’re an HIV-negative person, you sure can’t rely on the
fact that your partner is being treated,” said Dr Joel Gallant, vice-chairman
of the HIV Medicine Association and an HIV/AIDS doctor in Baltimore. The pill’s
cost could be a problem: A year’s supply costs $13,900, according to the
manufacturer.
Courtesy- IAN DUNCAN, Los Angeles Times.